MoX

Public => New Recruits => Topic started by: Flampz on 13 February, 2012, 07:38:12 am

Title: .
Post by: Flampz on 13 February, 2012, 07:38:12 am
.
Title: Re: [APPLICATION] Flampz - [Protection] Warrior.
Post by: Bandoh on 13 February, 2012, 02:54:09 pm
Is this the warrior you played since TBC  ?
Title: Re: [APPLICATION] Flampz - [Protection] Warrior.
Post by: Flampz on 13 February, 2012, 02:59:20 pm
No sadly it got hacked  :sorry: , but i've got multiple people that can Testimony if it's a problem :o.
Title: Re: [APPLICATION] Flampz - [Protection] Warrior.
Post by: Bandoh on 13 February, 2012, 03:09:46 pm
Well you don't have 4 set Tier 13 yet which is  a must for heroic progressing, you got mostly raid finder gear. Parry is great since the talent hold the line. But it should never be more then 5 % more then dodge due to diminishing returns etc.

You are only at 93.42 CTC at the moment, Even with the full stacks of resolve of undying up i dont think you will reach the full CTC cap. And without the stamina trinket your EH will drop alot. As i said we are progressing heroic bosses in both our core groups i do not think your gear meets the standard as of yet.

The decision is not mine to make but i think your gear is still lacking.
Title: Re: [APPLICATION] Flampz - [Protection] Warrior.
Post by: Flampz on 13 February, 2012, 03:12:08 pm
I am CTC Capped with Full stacks of resolve, and i'll have 4 set bonus after tonight. Parry is still a a greater value compared to dodge.
Title: Re: [APPLICATION] Flampz - [Protection] Warrior.
Post by: mats.olsen on 13 February, 2012, 03:28:05 pm
i'm no warr expert, but i'd just like to ask as a tank myself, why arent u taking the socket bonuses like on ur feet and your , ring , i can see that u are not block capped yet wich i think a warrior should be.

sincerely omgabsorbed
Title: Re: [APPLICATION] Flampz - [Protection] Warrior.
Post by: Bandoh on 13 February, 2012, 03:32:32 pm
Could you supply a link to your hacked char ?
Title: Re: .
Post by: szemere on 13 February, 2012, 04:56:38 pm
Apparantly supplying a link to that char was a bit much asked, amirite? Locking this down.